El paradigma mundialista: una nueva propuesta para la sociología
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2024v42.e2431Palabras clave:
Sociología mundial, Paradigmas, Teoría social, Ciencia, Cambio social mundial, Sociedad mundialResumen
En el presente artículo avanzo en la formulación de un paradigma cuyos componentes vienen germinando de forma inorgánica en el hemisferio occidental en el campo sociológico desde principios del siglo XXI. Este nuevo corpus intelectual, que denomino “paradigma mundialista” (PM), es portador de un dispositivo científico estructurado a partir de la dialéctica entre tres principios: mundialización, localización e historización. A la vez, el PM cuenta con un dispositivo crítico y un dispositivo político que, activados a partir del dispositivo científico, posibilitaría la recreación de una dinámica orientada a renovar el compromiso de la sociología con el cambio social. Aquí presento los elementos centrales que componen el PM, y los distingo de los resortes que sustentan los paradigmas sociológicos moderno y posmoderno ya consolidados.
Descargas
Citas
Alatas, Syed (2006a). Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. London: Sage.
Alatas, Syed (2006b). The Autonomous, the Universal and the Future of Sociology. Current Sociology, 54(1), 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106058831
Amin, Samir (1985). Eurocentrism: Critique of an ideology. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Anderson, Kevin (2016). Marx at the Margins. On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226345703.001.0001
Arrighi, Giovanni (1998). Capitalism and the Modern World-System: Rethinking the Nondebates of the 1970’s. Review, 21(1), 113-129.
Augé, Marc (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. New York: Verso.
Baber, Zaheer (2003). Provincial Universalism: the landscape of knowledge production in an Era of Globalization. Current Sociology, 51(6), 615-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516004
Bambirra, Vania (1974). El capitalismo dependiente latinoamericano. Mexico: Siglo XXI.
Bauman, Zygmunt (2013). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals. London: Polity.
Bhambra, Gurminder (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206410_3
Braudel, Fernand (1958). Histoire et Sciences sociales: La longue durée. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 13(4), 725-753. https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1958.2781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1958.2781
Beck, Ulrich (2000). What is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich (2007). The Cosmopolitan Condition. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7-8), 286-290.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764070240072505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764070240072505
Bringel, Breno, & Domingues, Maurício (2017). Teoría social, extroversión y autonomía. Dilemas de la sociología (semi) periférica contemporánea. Prácticas de Oficio, 1(19), 23-36.
Boatcă, Manuela (2015). Global Inequalities Beyond Occidentalism. Routledge: London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315584867
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Bulbeck, Chilla (1998). Re-Orienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Postcolonial World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552151
Burawoy, Michael (2000). A Sociology for the Second Great Transformation. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 26, 693-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.693
Burawoy, Michael (2005). Provincializing the Social Sciences. En Steinmetz, G. (ed.), The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham: Duke University Probinsonress (pp. 508-525). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smrtk.21
Bury, John (2014). The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry Into its Origin and Growth. New York: Dover.
Capra, F. Fritjof (1997). The Web of Life: A new Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor.
Cardoso, Fernando, & Faletto, Enzo (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342118
Castells, Manuel (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
Collste, Goran (2015). Global Rectificatory Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466129
Connell, Raewyn (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117346
Connell, Raewyn (2006). Northern theory: the political geography of general social theory. Theory and Society, 35, 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9004-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9004-y
Connell, Raewyn (2010). Periphery and Metropole in the History of Sociology. Sociologisk Forskning, 47(1), 72-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.47.18449
Cueva, Agustín (1976). A Summary of “Problems and Perspectives of Dependency Theory”. Latin American Perspectives, 3(4), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X7600300402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X7600300402
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2007). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828654
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. North Carolina: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000
Della Porta, Donatella & et al. (eds). (2007) Global Justice Movement. Cross-national and Transnational Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Dirlyk, Arif (2002). Modernity as History: Post-Revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity. Social History, 27(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071020110094183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03071020110094183
Domingues, Mauricio (2012). Global Modernity, Development, and Contemporary Civilization. Towards a Renewal of Critical Theory. London: Routledge.
Dos Santos, Theotonio (1972). The Structure of Dependence. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231-236.
Durkheim, Émile (2013). De la division du travail social. Paris: PUF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.durk.2013.01
Dussel, Enrique (2002). World-System and “Trans”-Modernity. Nepantla: Views from South, 3(2), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027239-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027239-9
Einstein, Albert (1967). The Meaning of Relativity. London: Science Paperbacks/Methuen.
Fals Borda, Orlando, &; Mora-Osejo, Luis (2003). Context and diffusion of knowledge. A critique of Eurocentrism, Action Research Volume, 1(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011003
Fasolt, Constantin (2004). The Limits of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fillafer, Maximilian (2017). A World Connecting? From the Unity of History to Global History. History and Theory, 56(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12000
Foucault, Michel (2004). La Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978-1979). Paris: Gallimard.
Furtado, Celso (1964). Development and Underdevelopment. Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520319721
Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Habermas, Jürgen (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hanafi, Sari (2019). Global sociology revisited: Toward new directions. Current Sociology, 68(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869051
Hobsbawm, Eric (1991). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521439612
Koselleck, Reinhart, & Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1987). Hermeneutik Und Historik. Heidelberg: Winter Unoiversitätsverlag.
Kuhn, Thomas (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
Giddens, Anthony (1990). Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Go, Julian (2016). Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. UK: Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625139.001.0001
Go, Julian, & Lawson, George (2016). Global Historical Sociology. UK: Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316711248.001
Guba, Egon (1990). Criteria for Assesing the truthworthiness of naturalistic inquires. In E. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury, Park, CA.: Sage.
Gunder Frank, André (1966). The Development of Underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), September. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-018-04-1966-08_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-018-04-1966-08_3
Lessenich, Stephan (2016). Neben uns die Sintflut: Die Externalisierungsgesellschaft und ihr Preis. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Lyotard, Jean-François (1979). La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Minuit.
Marini, Ruy Mauro (1973). Dialéctica de la dependencia. México: Era.
Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of Knowledge (pp. 59-89). London: Cambridge University Press.
Mignolo, Walter (2007). ‘Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality’. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 449-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
Milanovic, Branko (2016). Global Inequality. A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969797
Marx, Karl (2017). Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Berlin: Zenodot Verlagsgesellscha.
Moyn, Samuel (2013). On the Non-Globalization of Ideas. En Moyn, S. & Sartori, A. (eds.), Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 187-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/moyn16048-008
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2000). ‘Peoples without History’ in British and German Historical Thought. En Stuchtey, B. & Wende P. (eds), British and German Historiography, 1750-1950: Traditions, Perceptions, and Transfers (pp. 265-287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2015). The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849949
Parsons, Talcott (1991). The Social System. London: Routlegde.
Pocock, John (1962). The Origins of the Study of the Past: A Comparative Approach. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 4(2), 209-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001341
Prebisch, Raúl (1976). A Critique of Peripheral Capitalism. CEPAL Review, 9-76. First half of 1976. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/12273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/590c45b6-en
Quijano, Anibal (2000). Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Quijano, Anibal, & Wallerstein, Immanuel (1992). Americanity as a concept, or de Americas in the Modern World System. International Social Science Journal, XLIV, 4, 549-557.
Ribeiro, Darcy (1968). The Civilization Process. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Seth, Sanjay (2021). Beyond Reason: Postcolonial Theory and the Social Sciences. UK: Ofxord University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500583.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500583.001.0001
Tan, Kok-Chor (2004). Justice without Borders. Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511490385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
Therborn, Göran (2003). Entangled Modernities. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(3), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310030063002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310030063002
Torres, Esteban (2020). Hacia una nueva teoría del cambio social en América Latina: esquemas y elementos preliminares. En Torres, E. (ed.), Hacia la renovación de la teoría social latinoamericana (pp. 23-56). Buenos Aires: CLACSO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm036w.4
Torres, Esteban, & Borrastero, Carina (2020). Capitalism and the State in Latin América: Concentration of Power, Social Inequality and Environmental Depletion. En Bada, Xóchitl; Rivera Sánchez, Liliana (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The Sociology of Latin America (1-17). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190926557.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190926557.013.5
Torres, Esteban (2021a). The World Paradigm: A New Proposal for Sociology. Global Dialogue, 1, 11. https://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/articles/the-world-paradigm-a-new-proposal-for-sociology DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2024v42.e2431
Torres, Esteban (2021b). Hacia una revolución de la sociología en América Latina. El nuevo paradigma mundialista. En La gran transformación de la sociología (pp. 421-462). Córdoba-Buenos Aires: CLACSO-FCS.
Torres, Esteban (2022). The Intercapital System: Molecular and Organic Classes. Global Dialogue, 12, 2. https://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/articles/the-intercapital-system-molecular-and-organic-classes
Touraine, Alain (1984). Le retour de l’acteur. Paris: Fayard.
Trompf, Garry (1979). The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought from Antiquity to the Reformation. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312401
Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and its avatars. The dilemas of Social Sciences. Sociological Bulletin, 46(1), March 1997, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919970102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919970102
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2006). European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press.
Von Ranke, Leopold (2011). The Theory and Practice of History. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839195
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt (Main): Uni-print.
Zedelmaier, Helmut (2012). Schlözer und die Vorgeschichte. En Duchardt H.& Espenhorst M. (ed.), August Ludwig (von) Schlözer in Europa (p. 92). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666101038.179
Publicado
Cómo citar
-
Resumen734
-
PDF459
-
XML19
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Las personas autoras que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
a) Conservarán sus derechos de autoría y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
b) Podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
c) La persona autora sólo podrá difundir la obra hasta terminado el proceso de envío y dictaminación con el propósito de preservar el anonimato a los pares que lo evalúan.
Esta obra está bajo una 