Tipos de participación política y bienestar subjetivo: Un estudio mundial

Autores/as

  • Benjamín Temkin Flacso-México
  • Georgina Flores-Ivich Flacso-México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2017v35n104.1544

Palabras clave:

participación política, bienestar subjetivo, democracia, Encuesta Mundial de Valores

Resumen

El bienestar subjetivo ha sido descrito como, tal vez, “la variable dependiente fundamental” de las ciencias sociales, por lo cual no resulta sorpresivo que una buena parte de la literatura empírica sobre el tema se ha enfocado en identificar sus correlatos. En este trabajo evaluamos la relación entre distintos tipos de participación política y bienestar subjetivo utilizando la sexta ola de la Encuesta Mundial de Valores para sesenta países levantada entre 2010 y 2014. Nuestros resultados sugieren que, controlando por el grado de libertad de los diferentes países, existen diferencias sustantivas en la fuerza y dirección de la asociación entre distintos tipos de participación política y el bienestar subjetivo de los ciudadanos. Nuestra investigación confirma parcialmente la hipótesis de que formas convencionales de participación se asocian de manera significativa y positiva con la satisfacción individual con la vida, mientras las formas menos convencionales y más conflictivas, muestran una relación opuesta. Por otra parte, la naturaleza democrática de las instituciones, está universal y consistentemente asociada a mayores niveles de bienestar subjetivo de los individuos.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Benjamín Temkin, Flacso-México

Profesor Investigador de la Flacso México, donde también es el coordinador de la Especialidad en Política y Gestión Energética y Medioambiental. Ha sido catedrático en la Universidad de Columbia, Universidad de Tel-Aviv, Universidad Hebrea de Jerusalén, el Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), entre otras. Fue Senior Asociate Member del San Anthony College en Oxford y recibió el reconocimiento como Chubb Fellow de la Universidad de Yale.

Georgina Flores-Ivich, Flacso-México

Georgina Flores Ivich es Licenciada en Psicología por el Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora y Maestra en Ciencias Sociales por la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO). Actualmente estudia el doctorado en Ciencia Política en la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ha participado en diversos proyectos de consultoría e investigación académica nacionales e internacionales financiados por instituciones como Naciones Unidas, USAID, RAND Corporation, Fundación telefónica, INMUJERES y FLACSO, entre otras. Sus áreas de estudio son: la relación entre medios de comunicación y democracia, comportamiento político y opinión pública y derechos humanos. Sus trabajos más recientes han sido publicados en el Journal of Comparative and International Education (2013), en la revista psicología política de la Universidad de Valencia (2012) y en libros como: “Los derechos humanos en América Latina, metodología para su estudio y medición” (2015), “El comportamiento electoral mexicano en las elecciones de 2012” (2014), “Instituciones electorales, opinión pública y poderes políticos locales en México” (2013) y “América Latina: problemas centrales y oportunidades promisorias” (2012), entre otros. Actualmente trabaja en un proyecto de investigación sobre la relación entre libertad de prensa y corrupción en América Latina. Es profesora investigadora adjunta en la FLACSO México y desde 2013 imparte las clases de métodos cuantitativos y opinión pública en la Escuela de Comunicación de la Universidad Panamericana.

Citas

Álvarez-Díaz, A., González, L. & Radcliff, B. (2010). The politics of happiness: on the political determinants of quality of life in the American states. The Journal of Politics, 72(03), 894-905.

Arendt, H. (1988). Sobre la revolución (P. Bravo, traductor). Madrid, España: Alianza.

Bahry, D. & Silver, B. D. (1990). Soviet citizen participation on the eve of democratization. American Political Science Review, 84(03), 821-847.

Barber, B. (1984). Political talk-and “strong democracy”. Dissent, 31(2), 215-222.

Barker, C. & Martin, B. (2011). Participation: the happiness connection. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), 9.

Barnes, S. H. & Kaase, M. (Eds.) (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F. & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential election. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Berinsky, A. J. & Lenz, G. S. (2011). Education and political participation: exploring the causal link. Political Behavior, 33(3), 357-373.

Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A. & Fischer, J. A. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 419-430.

Blanchflower, D. G. & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: an empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393-415.

Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J. & Wang, Q. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 915-934.

Brown, S. (2000), The effect of union type on psychological well-being: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 241-255.

Campbell, A., Gurin, G. & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.

Chan, R. & Joseph, S. (2000). Dimensions of personality, domains of aspiration,and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 347-354.

Christensen, H. (2011). Political participation beyond the vote: how the institutional context shapes patterns of political participation in 18 Western European democracies. Helsinki, Finlandia: Åbo Akademi University Press.

Clark, A. E., Frijters, P. & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95-144.

DeNeve, K. M. & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197.

Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. The science of well-being. Ámsterdam, Países Bajos: Springer Netherlands.

Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151-157.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34.

Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103-157.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Oishi, S. & Suh, E. M. (2002). Looking up and looking down: weighting good and bad information in life satisfaction judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 437-445.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425.

Diener, E. & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambrigde, MA: The MIT Press.

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94-122.

Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G. & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 505-526.

Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G. & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: new evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 227-255.

Ekman, J. & Amná, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283-300.

Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32(1), 80-99.

Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: an approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058.

Emmons, R. A. & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89-97.

Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: evidence from a West German panel. The Journal of Politics, 49(02), 441-464.

Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891-913.

Flavin, P. & Keane, M. J. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63-78.

Frey, B. S. (2011). Tullock challenges: happiness, revolutions, and democracy. Public Choice, 148(3-4), 269-281.

Frey, B. S., Benz, M. & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 160, 377-401.

Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918-938.

Haring, M. J., Stock, W. A. & Okun, M. A. (1984). A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relations, 37(8), 645-657.

Hayes, N. & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 723-727.

Hayo, B. (2004). Happiness in Eastern Europe. Marburg Economic Working Paper, 12(1).

Headey, B. & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731.

Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331-360.

Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1435-1446.

Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43-62.

Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215-228.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies, vol. 19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165-183). Cambrigde, MA: The MIT Press.

Joshi, U. (2010). Subjective well-being by gender. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 1(1), 20-26.

Kahneman, D. & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3-24.

Keyes, C. L. & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: a handbook of models and measures. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Krause, J. S. (1998). Dimensions of subjective well-being after spinal cord injury: an empirical analysis by gender and race/ethnicity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(8), 900-909.

Krueger, A. B. (Ed.) (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: national accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Layard, R. (2010). Measuring subjective well-being. Science, 327(5965), 534-535.

Lederer, G. (1986). Protest movements as a form of political action. In M. G. Hermann (Ed.), Political Psychology (pp. 355-378). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lorenzini, J. (2015). Subjective well-being and political participation: a comparison of unemployed and employed youth. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 381-404.

Madsen, D. (1987). Political self-efficacy tested. American Political Science Review, 81(02), 571-581.

Marien, S., Hooghe, M. & Quintelier, E. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: a multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58(1), 187-213.

Marks, G. N. & Flemming, N. (1999). Influences and consequences of well-being among Australian young people: 1980-1995. Social Indicators Research, 46(3), 301-323.

Michalos, A. & Orlando, J. (2006). Quality of life of some under-represented survey respondents: youth, aboriginals and unemployed. Social Indicators Research, 79, 191-213.

Milbrath, L. W. (1981). Political participation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), The handbook of political behavior (pp. 197-240). Nueva York, NY: Springer.

Owen, A. L., Videras, J. & Willemsen, C. (2008). Democracy, participation, and life satisfaction. Social Science Quarterly, 89(4), 987-1005.

Pacek, A. C. (2009). Politics and happiness: an empirical ledger. In A. K. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics: towards a multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 231-256). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Pacek, A. & Radcliff, B. (2008). Assessing the welfare state: the politics of happiness. Perspectives on Politics, 6(02), 267-277.

Przeworski, A. (Ed.) (2000). Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990, vol. 3. Nueva York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: the political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 939-952.

Richard, E. & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht, Países Bajos: Springer Netherlands.

Rode, M. (2013). Do good institutions make citizens happy, or do happy citizens build better institutions? Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(5), 1479-1505.

Røysamb, E., Tawls, K., Reichborn-Kjenneruc, T., Neale, M. C., & Harris, J. R. (2003). Happiness and health: environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1136-1146.

Ryan, R. M. & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529-565.

Sabucedo, J. & Arce, C. (1991). Types of political participation: a multidimensional analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 20(1), 93-102.

Schyns, P. (2001). Income and satisfaction in Russia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(2), 173-204.

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J. & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380-1393.

Shields, M. A. & Price, S. W. (2005). Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological well-being and perceived social support in England. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(3), 513-537.

Shmotkin, D. (1990). Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: a multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research, 23(3), 201-230.

Sousa-Poza, A. & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2007). The effect of job satisfaction on labor turnover by gender: an analysis for Switzerland. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(6), 895-913.

Stadelmann-Steffen, I. & Vatter, A. (2012). Does satisfaction with democracy really increase happiness? Direct democracy and individual satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Behavior, 34(3), 535-559.

Steel, P., Schmidt, J. & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138.

Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89-109.

Stutzer, A. & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326-347.

Tait, M., Padgett, M. & Baldwin, T. (1989). Job and life satisfaction: a reevaluation of the strength of the relationship and gender effects as a function of the date of the study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 502-507.

Tavits, M. (2008). Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607-1630.

Thoits, P. A. & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115-131.

Thompson, D. F. (1970). The democratic citizen: social science and democratic theory in the twentieth century. Nueva York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Thorensen, C., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R. & De Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 914-945.

Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P. & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy ofsubjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29-49.

Vecchione, M. & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: the contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487-492.

Veenhoven, R. (2000). Well-being in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2(1), 91-125.

Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Social Indicators Research, 32(2), 101-160.

Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 333-354.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E. & Nie, N. (1995). American citizen participation study, 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Vráblíková, K. (2013). How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47(5), 1-27.

Weitz-Shapiro, R. & Winters, M. S. (2011). The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4), 101-126.

Descargas

Publicado

2017-05-01

Cómo citar

Temkin, B., & Flores-Ivich, G. (2017). Tipos de participación política y bienestar subjetivo: Un estudio mundial. Estudios Sociológicos De El Colegio De México, 35(104), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2017v35n104.1544